I guess you could always do

for (var i in myNode)
{
        trace(i + " =\t\t" + myNode[i]);
}

That might uncover the little blighter.

Lee




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of coroner
Sent: 10 April 2006 14:57
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] dumb xml question

trace, trace and trace again untill you find the right node/childNode...
at
least that's what i did until i got along with xml...
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

Reply via email to