No one cares, Jim, if their Flash works.  Just because we're coder geeks 
doesn't mean we're JavaScript coder geeks, hah!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Kremens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Q: Flash Object vs UFO for flash detection and 
aseolas workaround


Did you ever look at the code?

Jim Kremens

On 4/14/06, bryan.rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 14, 2006, at 12:44 PM, elibol wrote:
>
> > I don't much like FlashObject
>
>
> What don't you like about it?  I have deployed many sites with it
> (using express install) and have never had an issue.  I quite like
> it, (I used to use Colin's Moock FPI), so I am curious as to why you
> don't.
>
> blue skies,
> bryan
> _______________________________________________
> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com
>


--
Jim Kremens
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com 

_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

Reply via email to