It's circumstancial, I have no preference. Depending on the problem, one
will solve better than the other. However, which will solve a particular
problem better is controversial.
M.
On 4/26/06, Jim Tann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> After a long time of trying to figure which method of using getters &
> setters is better I though the best way to get a good answer is to throw
> it open to the list.
>
> Do you prefer to use the inbuilt getter & setter functionality?
> i.e.
>
> public function get myProperty():Number{ return _myProperty; }
> public function set myProperty(intSet:Number):Void{ _myProperty =
> intSet; }
>
> or do you prefer using normal functions?
> i.e.
>
> public function getMyProperty():Number{ return _myProperty; }
> public function setMyProperty(intSet:Number):Void{ _myProperty = intSet;
> }
>
> I like the first method as it looks cleaner, but there have been issues
> with inheritance where if you overwrite either the getter or setter, but
> not both in the child class it gets ignored.
>
> What are your views?
> Jim
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected]
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
