If you get a nice clean XML structure, XPath will save you a lot of code.
It takes a bit of getting used to but it will make your life easier.
Ron
Sajid Saiyed wrote:
Hi Ron,
I can modify the XML structure and will not be a problem , I will try
your suggested solution.
Merill,
I am trying to use XPATH feature built in Flash8. I will try your
suggestino as well.
Hope to get to a solution soom, but the discussion is surely helping
me right now.
Sajid
On 6/5/06, Merrill, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I believe it used to be, but anymore the difference is negligible.
In my experience, on small data sets, it makes little difference.
However, using attributes over nodes can in some cases decrease the
actual size of the XML file or string by a factor of 3 or 4, do this can
make a difference on larger data sets, especially the more complex ones.
Jason Merrill
Bank of America
Learning Technology Solutions
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
