> There are plenty of reasons why people in corporate environments run > Windows > 2000 Workstation, that have nothing to do with the speed of technology or > Moore's law (which has absolutely nothing to do with operating systems).
There are plenty of reasons I don't work in corporate environments. Bureaucracy is one of them. > I use Win2000 when working - there is no reason to use XP for us. I can > upgrade to XP whenever I choose, I just know I'll have fewer problems > using Win2000, etc. So you're saying Windows XP has problems Windows 2000 doesn't? I could list problems 2000 has that XP doesn't. > I don't think its a wicked thing to use an older OS if a new one poses no > serious benefits I would be required to rely on. I don't think it's wicked either. At no point during my joke post, denoted by the winky at the end, did I imply that using an older OS is evil. But, you just proved the point. Serious benefits you be would required to rely on = Flash 9 IDE. Backwards compatibility is the bane of progress. _______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
