ps whether you do this through a naming convention as you mentioned, or through storing a row and column property for each piece doesnt really matter i guess.
On 8/3/06, Hans Wichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Gunther, imagine the puzzle in its correct configuration: ABCD EFGH I see this as the grid Now if i tell you A, B and E are in a group, you automatically know B is the right neighbour of A, since they can only be in the same group if they connect, and they will only connect if they are in the correct configuration. greetz Hans On 7/31/06, Guntur N. Sarwohadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Hans, > > Hmm.. ok.. i think i see what you and Danny are talking about. yes, i > think > and hope that will solve the problem.. > > You dont need to explicitly define a's neighbours, since its a grid, so > you > > know how to find it's direct neighbour if necessary. > > > But if i don't define neighbours, how would i tell a piece to stick at a > > certain piece on a certain side?.. except I'm using a certain naming > convention (like you said, grids) which automatically tells where this > piece > should stick at.. is this approach is what you mean? > > big thanks guys, > > Guntur N. Sarwohadi > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > To change your subscription options or search the archive: > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software > Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training > http://www.figleaf.com > http://training.figleaf.com >
_______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
