http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flash/articles/as_bestpractices.html
check the archives or search flashcoders through google http://muzakdeezign.com/flashcoders/ http://muzakdeezign.com/flashcoders/?q=best%20practices http://muzakdeezign.com/flashcoders/?q=AS2%20best%20practices http://muzakdeezign.com/flashcoders/?q=OOP%20best%20practices Muzak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Flashcoders mailing list" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:53 AM Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Moving to AS2, array always undefined >> A bad practice most likely, but not technically wrong. I do see it in >> text books from time to time. I was just mentioning it as a case where >> "this" *would* be needed as opposed to speaking in absolutes. >> >> In practice, you're right and I try not to name any parameters the same >> as a field name to avoid "this" confusion. Don't tell anyone, but >> sometimes I don't even use "this". :) > > ok - some interesting points here. could someone clarify for me > please, whether I should be using this in my classes or not! It's > really just a habit I've been in to do so. > > Also, what's the current naming convention? It used to be to add a > _suffix to each item, to trigger the code hints (and help > readability), but from the posts above, it looks like people are > prefering to use a suffic preceeding, is it just personal preference > or is there some best practice here. > > Thanks! > > jon > ps: I'm enjoying getting my feet wet with AS2 atm :) > > -- > > > jon bennett _______________________________________________ [email protected] To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com
