I ran the source locally, and the framerate is printed to standard
out. Try it yourself.

Scott

On 07/12/06, Scott Hyndman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I ran the source locally, and the framerate is printed to standard
out. Try it yourself.

Scott

On 7-Dec-06, at 5:19 PM, Christian Giordano wrote:

> Scott Hyndman wrote:
>> Oh, that was the Ruby version. I just tried the Java version and I'm
>> getting about 2000 fps. 4x faster doesn't "REALLY suck" in my book.
>> And what would you expect? Java's pretty speedy.
>
> 4x faster? well, it's also 11 times smaller :)
>
> where do u read 2000 frs? My eyes, that can see only 30 frs, see
> only a cranky animation. Probably it's only an animation synch issue.
>
> Best, chr
>
> --
> ___________________________________________________________________
> { Christian Giordano's site and blog @ http://nuthinking.com }
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected]
> To change your subscription options or search the archive:
> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
>
> Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
> Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
> http://www.figleaf.com
> http://training.figleaf.com


_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com

Reply via email to