The way to do it is to move your function from the frame script into a class
even though you may not ideally want to. Make them static functions.
To be able to use the functions in the frame code, you would then just
refer to classname.functionName() rather than plain functionName().
If you did this, you could also refer to them from other classes, though in
many respects it's just bad OO practice.
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Kodicek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 2:03 AM
Subject: [Flashcoders] Addressing functions in frame script from class
script
If I have a class that extends MovieClip, and various movieClips that use
that class, is there a way for a function in the class to speak to a
function that's on the first frame of the clip? Or is it not possible to
mix
and match scripting styles like that? (leaving aside the question of
whether
it's wise or advisable...)
Otherwise, I guess I'll need to use #include instead of classes.
Danny
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
_______________________________________________
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
