OK, after researching more I found out that applying a filter to a MC will actually turn bitmapcaching on for that MC anyway.
I did stumble on this which is interesting: http://www.sebleedelisle.com/?p=35 Anyone know the theory of how this works? On 3/20/07, Mick G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the reply Steven - I understand I'm pushing things here. Would you think cacheasbitmap would help in this situation? If you apply a blur to a MC, then cacheasbitmap, does that convert the MC with blur to a cached bitmap? If so, my guess is it would probably help the cpu, but take a huge amount of ram. On 3/20/07, Steven Sacks | BLITZ < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 500 MCs is gonna be a hit already on VM1, 500 blurred MCs? Best of > luck. > > AS3/FP9 you'll have better performance but 500 blurs seems like lot. I > would suggest you write some an algorithm that creates groups of clips > with the same blur into container clips and blur the container clips > rather than all the individual clips. > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > To change your subscription options or search the archive: > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > > Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software > Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training > http://www.figleaf.com > http://training.figleaf.com >
_______________________________________________ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training http://www.figleaf.com http://training.figleaf.com