Hi Jason. This custom solution sounds very interesting. Would you like to share it with others? Or refer to a similar solution? :-))
Vayu On 2/4/08 6:36 PM, "Jason Lutes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are several problems with the Adobe code/solution, and at least > one was already mentioned. My biggest complaint about it was that its > JavaScript was so poorly written. (It even generated malformed mark-up > at one point.) > > Another complaint I have with the Adobe code/solution is one I also have > for SWF Object. The list of function arguments that are expected when > embedding Flash media is unnecessarily cumbersome. > > I use a custom solution for embedding my Flash media, in order to keep > the JavaScript file size down (to under half of the SWF Object > footprint), to more efficiently (code-wise) do the same kinds of > (essential) embedding tasks, and to provide a simpler interface for > embedding. > > It has proven to carry a higher degree of sensible usability (over UFO, > SWF Object, the Adobe hack, or other) for coding neophytes, as verified > by co-workers who have harnessed it. > > > - > Jason > > Vlado Krempl wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> Question: >> When embedding a flash movie in HTML - >> Is everyone using the Publish settings that flash CS3 comes with > "AC_RunActiveContent.js etc or >> is the "SWF OBject still the preferred way? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Vlado Krempl >> M 0433 781740 > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
