I don't think anything would be faster than having no code to execute ;) You forgot to paste it.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Helmut Granda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to edit the code below to be included into just one for > loop > and would it actually be faster? On a side note any site/book > recommendations on "how to" for this kind of odd sequences.. > > TIA > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
