> From what you are saying, does FF3 not use its own implementation of ssl, > and connects to the proxy first, where the open text is sent to the proxy, > and the proxy is responsible for encrypting the data? If this is the case, > then it solves most of my problems; however, I can only think of a few > possible uses for this: custom network environments to increase available > bandwidth; or to use different encryption methods for proprietary encrypted > client server communication. > > Now that I am thinking clearly, is this the case? and if so, thank you very > much for the suggestion.
You'd have the proxy listen for HTTP requests, and send HTTPS requests. It's pretty simple, actually. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
