On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Glen Pike<g...@engineeredarts.co.uk> wrote: > Aha, I see now - bit of a waste of code too.
Yeah, I agree, it's overly verbose. > And who's bright idea was it to use length for Strings and Arrays, but > length() for XML / e4x? It's because in E4X: someNode.length Means get this node: <someNode> <length/> </someNode> :-) The brackets () are the only way to work out what you mean... Ian _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
