How unfortunate. Although it doesn't really make that much difference in this scenario.
On 27 Dec 2009, at 16:15, Paul Andrews wrote: > Henrik Andersson wrote: >> Paul Andrews wrote: >>> Piers Cowburn wrote: >>> I think the compiler is still seeing the typed Vector as Vector, not >>> typed vectors. Consequently a lookup is still involved. The >>> Vector.<Someclass> declaration seems more of a syntactic convenience >>> rather than anything else. >>> >>> That's just guesswork on my part. >>> >>> Paul >> >> The compiler most definitively uses different opcodes for vectors, so it is >> not just a syntax convenience. > Well, I would expect it to use different code for Vectors, but the code > generation may not be clever enough to look up the method associated with the > class reference for a given item, but will look up the method reference at > runtime. > > Paul >> _______________________________________________ >> Flashcoders mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders >> > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
