whoops, sorry wrong thread :) On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Taka Kojima <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm siding with Steven on this one. > > Beno seems to be the worst offender, but it's not just him. It's quite > clear that he doesn't understand the fundamentals and basics -- that's his > main problem. > > He's working off of a very shallow and glib understanding of things, thus > it's a recurring issue where he comes to the list and asks for help whenever > he hits a wall. > > Asking for help is not bad, asking for help on questions that you really > should know the answer to and if you don't you should figure it out on your > own, is just lazy. Pick up a book on Actionscript and OOP fundamentals and > then you can start coming to the list to ask for help. > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Steven Sacks <[email protected]>wrote: > >> As a rule, I only put string values that never contain special characters >> in attributes, otherwise you end up with XML validation errors (like putting >> ampersands in attributes). >> >> Also, I generally put parsing code inside the constructor of the VO class >> (well, I call deserialize() because code inside constructors are >> interpreted). >> >> public class ValueObject >> { >> public var foo:String; >> public var bar:String; >> >> public function ValueObject(node:XML) >> { >> deserialize(node); >> } >> private function deserialize(node:XML):void >> { >> foo = no...@foo; >> bar = node.bar; >> } >> } >> >> There are exceptions to this rule, but they're rare. >> >> It makes it really easy to share VOs between multiple service classes when >> the parsing logic is contained with the VO instead of each service class >> (assuming that the xml is homogenized). >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Flashcoders mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders >> > > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
