>>" because I was trying to have really clean xml, everything as tags, no attributes "
Heh heh, yeah, I think a bunch of child nodes is messier, more attributes is cleaner (and this leaner) but it's a matter of perspective I guess. :) Jason Merrill Bank of America Global Learning Learning & Performance Soluions Join the Bank of America Flash Platform Community and visit our Instructional Technology Design Blog (note: these are for Bank of America employees only) -----Original Message----- From: flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com [mailto:flashcoders-boun...@chattyfig.figleaf.com] On Behalf Of Mendelsohn, Michael Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 10:51 AM To: Flash Coders List Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] E4X question Thanks for the responses... Jason: You're right...as always! :-) Having s as an attribute will make my life easier. I was trying to do it with a tag though, because I was trying to have really clean xml, everything as tags, no attributes. My train of thought is that actually, the p tags are art pieces, so I figured if the s were a tag instead of an attribute, I could discern more than one artist working on any individual piece. I wonder what your opinion on that would be. Jer: Your solution worked! Much appreciated. Kenneth: Thanks for streamlining it. You're an E4X genius. Thanks my friends!! - MM _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
