Just from a quick look... performance is erratic (either stuttering or smooth), things move all the time without notice (dragging the bar is painful), dragging will randomly select HTML elements. FF 3.6.3.
Most of the text is based off images, as is the company logo (why no SVG?). Performance in my Nexus One is erratic. It sort of works, but nothing is draggable and accessing the combo (rollover?) is an adventure. A great tech demo, but if this is the best HTML5 can do -- worse performance and user experience, seemingly much harder execution and maintenance, and one can easily create a website that ceases to work for other platforms -- then I can't help but roll my eyes. Again. Still waiting to see the reasons why Flash doesn't have a bright future ahead. Zeh On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Matt S. <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.luigibormioli.com/ > > On the one hand, its undeniably a beautiful site, and manages to > incorporate flash-level interactivity smoothly and effectively. This > is an excellent proof of concept for the power of jQuery. > > On the other hand, it doesnt work in the iPad. Relying as it does on > dragging, much of the interactivity gets lost, and the site is much > too large for the iPad screen. Performance is somewhat stuttered at > times. so while it is technically viewable in an iDevice, the > experience leaves much to be desired. It's a shame we can't view Flash > on an iPad for testing purposes because I'd love to see how a > comparable site performs in reality. Yes, Flash would crunch the > CPU's, but then again so does jQuery when used so heavily. > > .m > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > [email protected] > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list [email protected] http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
