That right there has been cracking me up since day one. There's no ad block for html. :)
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:30 AM, tom rhodes <tom.rho...@gmail.com> wrote: > totally, that's why i've been learning haxe for ages :) > > i'm still dissapointed that adobe have pulled away from supporting flash on > mobile devices though, as andriods market share increased the more positive > i was about flash on mobiles. if it got to the point that the majority of > the people using tablets and smartphones were running android and thus the > majority of people on the mobile web could run flash then perhaps MS and > apple would have had to rethink a bit in regards to flash. > > still it's going to be funny when ads start being made predominently in > HTML5 and they start crashing the */&% out of mobile browsers by being > poorly made processor hogging monsters, and it not being a plug in means it > can't be blocked etc. > > On 9 November 2011 17:07, Paul Andrews <p...@ipauland.com> wrote: > > > On 09/11/2011 15:33, tom rhodes wrote: > > > >> well, that's all well and good saying it seems silly, but the internet > >> browsed from a desktop machine will rapidly become the minority of the > >> internet userbase. > >> > > That's a way off yet. > > > > > >> so then what? adobe has a browser plugin that's selling point is 99% > >> penetration. well they can't say that anymore seeing as they are > >> abandoning > >> flash as a mobile platform. so it becomes 99% of desktop computers. not > >> exactly great if desktop users make up less than half of the target > >> audience... > >> > > > > For one platform they have no choice and for another platform they have > no > > choice for the most popular browser, so the fragmentation isn't down to > > them. > > > > The world doesn't stand still. > > > > > >> On 9 November 2011 16:19, Paul Andrews<p...@ipauland.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 09/11/2011 14:39, Henrik Andersson wrote: > >>> > >>> I see no reason why flash 11 would be the last player version. In > fact, > >>>> the article is quite clear that Adobe does not mind it if other > parties > >>>> were to port their players (providing they properly license it of > >>>> course), just that they will no longer do it themselves. > >>>> > >>>> The indirectly linked to blog post also outright states that Adobe is > >>>> working on a new version of the Flash player. > >>>> > >>>> So in short, Adobe just dropped their own port of the Flash player. > >>>> > >>>> Only on mobile platforms.. > >>> > >>> I think their problem is that Apple and Windows Mobile IE wont have the > >>> plugin, so it seems silly to invest in a mobile plugin technology that > >>> only > >>> addresses part of the mobile space. It's different when it comes to air > >>> deployment and the desktop. > >>> > >>> Paul > >>> > >>> ______________________________****_________________ > >>> > >>>> Flashcoders mailing list > >>>> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.****com<Flashcoders@chattyfig.** > >>>> figleaf.com <Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com>> > >>>> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/****mailman/listinfo/flashcoders< > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/**mailman/listinfo/flashcoders> > >>>> <**http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/**mailman/listinfo/flashcoders< > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ______________________________****_________________ > >>> Flashcoders mailing list > >>> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.****com<Flashcoders@chattyfig.** > >>> figleaf.com <Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com>> > >>> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/****mailman/listinfo/flashcoders< > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/**mailman/listinfo/flashcoders> > >>> <**http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/**mailman/listinfo/flashcoders< > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders> > >>> > > >>> > >>> ______________________________**_________________ > >> Flashcoders mailing list > >> Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.**com <Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > >> http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/**mailman/listinfo/flashcoders< > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders> > >> > >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > > Flashcoders mailing list > > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.**com <Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com> > > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/**mailman/listinfo/flashcoders< > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders> > > > _______________________________________________ > Flashcoders mailing list > Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com > http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders > _______________________________________________ Flashcoders mailing list Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
