On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01.10.2009 11:10, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> On 23.07.2009 04:06, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: >> >>> If a chip is not on the RDID generic vendor list nor on the REMS >>> specific ID list, flashrom will claim that no chip is there. Handle >>> these cases gracefully. flashrom will ignore generic matches if a >>> specific chip was found, so this will have no impact on supported chips, >>> but help a lot for a first quick analysis by the user or developer. The >>> only drawback is that unknown chips may be recognized multiple times >>> until they are added to flashchips.[ch]. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> >>> >> >> Ping? >> > > Ping? This is the oldest unapplied and unacked patch. It was posted > almost 4 months ago. (And a on the coreboot list before that.) > http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/67/ if you can't find the patch anymore. > > Regards, > Carl-Daniel
I have no way to test the generic read but the code looks fine. Acked-by: Marc Jones <[email protected]> -- http://marcjonesconsulting.com _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
