Am Montag, den 18.01.2010, 10:48 -0800 schrieb Sean Nelson:
> - .erase = erase_stm50flw0x0x,
> + .erase = NULL,
> + .block_erasers =
> + {
> + {
> + .eraseblocks = {
> + {4 * 1024, 16},
> + {4 * 1024, 16},
> + {64 * 1024, 5},
> + {4 * 1024, 16},
> + },
> + .block_erase = erase_sector_stm50flw0x0x,
> + }, {
> + .eraseblocks = { {64 * 1024, 8}, },
> + .block_erase = erase_block_stm50flw0x0x,
> + }, {
> + .eraseblocks = { {512 * 1024, 1} },
> + .block_erase = erase_chip_stm50flw0x0x,
> + }
> + },
I don't think this is going to work. erase_sector_stm50flw0x0x only
works on the 4K sectors and not on the 64k blocks inbetween, if I read
the datasheet correctly. As I already wrote in the first review:
flashrom is currently unable to represent this architecture (different
block sizes that have to be delete by different commands), so you better
leave it off. Another possible, but a bit hacky, version would be to
check sectorsize in erwase_sector_stm50flw0x0x and call
erase_block_stm50flw0x0x if sectorsize is 64*1024.
Regards,
Michael Karcher
_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
