On 23.01.2010 18:59, Uwe Hermann wrote: > Anyway, the attached patch is more correct than svn anyway (unless I > read the datasheet wrong), so we should apply it nevertheless IMHO. >
Could you please regenerate the patch with at least 17 lines of context? Otherwise it is very difficult to review without applying it (no chip name/ID in the patch). To generate a diff with 17 lines of context in svn: svn diff -x -U17 --diff-cmd diff Thanks! Regards, Carl-Daniel -- Developer quote of the year: "We are juggling too many chainsaws and flaming arrows and tigers." _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
