On 2/11/10 4:08 PM, David Hendricks wrote:
Okay, so I applied the same changes to the W25x16 and got good
results. It looks like the same applies to the W25x{16,32,64} products
in addition to the W25x{10,20,40,80}. Please update the patch to
include the additional chips.
W25x{16,32,64} datasheet:
http://www.winbond-usa.com/products/Nexflash/pdfs/datasheets/W25X16_32_64h.pdf
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:56 PM, David Hendricks <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
D'oh! I just realized that this patch doesn't affect the x16. I
really ought to read the patch more carefully...
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:50 PM, David Hendricks
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Sean Nelson
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Fix erase blocks for Winbond W25X* SPI chips. The Winbond
W25X10 and related chips only have 4k and 64k blocks and
only accept erase commands: 20h, d8h, and c7h.
Signed-off-by: Sean Nelson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Tested on a W25x16 flash chip using an NM10 southbridge.
Verbose flashrom -E log attached. Following an erase with a
read, the image produced turns up all 0xFF bytes. The warnings
reported seem benign, and probably have more to do with the
NM10 than the flash chip...
Acked by: David Hendricks <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
--
David Hendricks (dhendrix)
Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
--
David Hendricks (dhendrix)
Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
--
David Hendricks (dhendrix)
Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
The W25x16 and the W25x16BV use the exact same chip ids but the W25x16BV
supports the already defined erase commands.
_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
