Hi Ted, On 18.02.2010 23:44, [email protected] wrote: > Probe and read of the w39v040c work indeed. Thanks Carl-Daniel! >
Thank you for testing so quickly. > For further testing I will use a pm49fl004 I had lying around. > A probe and read were successful also. Nice, as I had hoped. > Erasing the chip failed however. > That's expected with the current source tree. We're in the process of converting the chip unlock code to a new interface, and right now only a very small number of chips has the necessary unlock functionality. > flashrom v0.9.1-r906 > No coreboot table found. > DMI string 0: "System manufacturer" > DMI string 1: "System Product Name" > DMI string 2: "System Version" > DMI string 3: "ASUSTeK Computer INC." > DMI string 4: "M2N-MX" > DMI string 5: "Rev 1.xx" > Found ITE SuperI/O, id 8712 > Found chipset "NVIDIA MCP61", enabling flash write... This chipset is not > really supported yet. Guesswork... > ISA/LPC bridge reg 0x8a contents: 0x00, bit 6 is 0, bit 5 is 0 > Guessed flash bus type is LPC > Yay. Our guess worked out just fine. > Found SMBus device 10de:03eb at 00:01:1 > SPI BAR is at 0x00000000, after clearing low bits BAR is at 0x00000000 > MCP SPI is not used. > OK. > This chipset supports the following protocols: LPC. > Calibrating delay loop... 588M loops per second, 100 myus = 191 us. OK. > [...] > Probing for Winbond W39V040C, 512 KB: Chip lacks correct probe timing > information, using default 10mS/40uS. probe_jedec_common: id1 0xda, id2 0x50 > Found chip "Winbond W39V040C" (512 KB, LPC) at physical address 0xfff80000. > I guess we can mark the MCP61 as partially supported now. The failing erase is a chip issue, not a chipset issue, and will be addressed in due course. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- "I do consider assignment statements and pointer variables to be among computer science's most valuable treasures." -- Donald E. Knuth _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
