Am Sonntag, den 28.02.2010, 00:16 +0100 schrieb Michael Karcher: Board enable backlog is going down rapidly! Thanks to Sean Nelson for the review/Ack.
> > Abit IP35 Pro: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/843/ > > - Board enable works, but we have one report that the BIOS backflashes > > itself. No idea what happens. > No two BIOS chips on board. > flashrom/lspci/superiotool: > http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-January/001837.html Committed in r920 > > Abit VT6X4: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/955/ depending on > > http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/948/ > Uwe wanted to take a look at 948 Still waiting for the review to the base patch (VIA GPIO generalization). Can submit a rebased patch if that helps. Sean's general Ack applies to the board enable patch. > > HP Vectra VL420SFF: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/919/ Committed in r923 > > Intel SE440BX-2: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/842/ > > - Board enable does not work. GPO register on PIIX4 is for strange > > reasons read-only, see > > http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-February/002272.html > flashrom/lspci/superiotool: > http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2010-January/001988.html > Ack: None, as the patch doesn't work. > Plan: Unsure, because "broken" is not an option, only tested/not tested. Plan: Postpone past 0.9.2, probably drop. > > HP Vectra VL400: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/721/ > Already committed. Committed in r918 > > Asus M2NBP-VM CSM: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/717/ Committed in r924 > > MSI MS7207: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/659/ > Plan: Commit in "not tested" state. Ack by some developer needed per > signoff procedure. Committed in r925 Regards, Michael Karcher _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
