On 3/20/10 1:59 AM, Michael Karcher wrote:
Am Freitag, den 19.03.2010, 10:54 -0700 schrieb Sean Nelson:
+int unlock_82802ab(struct flashchip *flash)
+{
+ int i;
+ //chipaddr wrprotect = flash->virtual_registers + page + 2;
+
+ for (i = 0; i< flash->total_size; i+= flash->page_size)
+ {
+ chip_writeb(0, flash->virtual_registers + i + 2);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
Sorry for rushing in so late. This is wrong.
flash->total_size is in kilobytes, and flas->page_size is in bytes.
Regards,
Michael Karcher
You're right! Here's a patch fix.
Signed-off-by: Sean Nelson <[email protected]>
Index: stm50flw0x0x.c
===================================================================
--- stm50flw0x0x.c (revision 960)
+++ stm50flw0x0x.c (working copy)
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
{
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < flash->total_size; i+= flash->page_size) {
+ for (i = 0; i < flash->total_size * 1024; i+= flash->page_size) {
if(unlock_block_stm50flw0x0x(flash, i)) {
fprintf(stderr, "UNLOCK FAILED!\n");
return -1;
Index: 82802ab.c
===================================================================
--- 82802ab.c (revision 960)
+++ 82802ab.c (working copy)
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
int i;
//chipaddr wrprotect = flash->virtual_registers + page + 2;
- for (i = 0; i < flash->total_size; i+= flash->page_size)
+ for (i = 0; i < flash->total_size * 1024; i+= flash->page_size)
{
chip_writeb(0, flash->virtual_registers + i + 2);
}
_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
