On 20.05.2010 21:14, Uwe Hermann wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 02:25:40PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >> - If we want to get flashrom working with libpayload, we'd better not >> rely on the more exotic features of libpci because every such feature >> has to be coded up and I don't think we want to link flashrom-as-payload >> against the whole libpci. >> - The enterprise distro problem mentioned below. >> > > Yeah, I agree. It doesn't make sense to support arbitrarily old > versions, but this one still seems to be in use nowadays and the fix > is pretty simple in this case, so why not... > > Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <[email protected]> >
Thanks, committed in r1004. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
