On 2010/06/25 00:21, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2010/06/22 04:02, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > Hi Stuart, hi Ian, > > > > thanks for the enthusiastic response. > > I added a few fixups to the flashrom tree in the meantime to get the > > OpenBSD patch size down a bit. After all, if it gets easier for you to > > test, we all win. > > > > Stuart, if this works for you, I'll commit the patches into flashrom > > subversion ASAP. My stated goal is to support every OS without the need > > for any local patches. > > > > A good first step to check if flashrom could run on your system is to > > run lspci. You may have to set > > machdep.allowaperture=2 > > and possibly other settings to get it working. > > flashrom uses raw memory access (/dev/mem), raw x86 port access (via > > inb/outb functions) and PCI access (via libpci). > > Port attached and at http://spacehopper.org/flashrom.tgz; this is > basically your patches with a typo fixed (missing ; in the Makefile). > > You can see exampkle output from an unsuccessful run on amd64 > attempting to dump rom contents at http://spacehopper.org/flashroom.txt
Sorry, typo: http://spacehopper.org/flashrom.txt Port at http://spacehopper.org/flashrom.tgz is updated (add dmidedode as a RUN_DEPENDS and tidy the Makefile). _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
