On 21.07.2010 18:14, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 21.07.2010 17:11, Idwer Vollering wrote: > >> 2010/7/21 rayer <[email protected]> >> >> >>> Thanks, I'll try... >>> >>> > > Great. Please note that the parameter changed from > -p rayer_bitbang_spi > to > -p rayer_spi > because the short form is faster to type, and users do not care at all > about bitbanging. > > >>> Please could you place the dos binary to some stable loacation >>> so i could link it from my web? >>> >>> >> What exactly is unstable about khepri ? Nothing, if you ask me :) >> Feel free to link to that download location. >> >> > > I think this is about the changing URL. > http://khepri.coresystems.de/%7Eidwer/flashrom/r1093-patchwork-1666/ > won't be around forever, but maybe we can make a stable link. > > http://khepri.coresystems.de/%7Eidwer/flashrom/ could maybe get a > "latest" directory which points to the current trunk compile. > > Martin, another option would be to link to > http://khepri.coresystems.de/%7Eidwer/flashrom/ and tell people to use > the "latest" or the "0.9.3" link once we have those in place. Then > people can decide if they want a release or the latest code. I plan to > release 0.9.3 soon (next 4 weeks) anyway. >
%7Eidwer looks unreadable in a URL. You can replace it with ~idwer like this: http://khepri.coresystems.de/~idwer/flashrom/ Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
