On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 07:10:19PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > -/** > > +/* > > * @cmpbuf buffer to compare against, cmpbuf[0] is expected to match the > > flash content at location start > > * @start offset to the base address of the flash chip > > @@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ > > return ret; > > } > > > > -/** > > +/* > > * Check if the buffer @have can be programmed to the content of @want > > without > > * erasing. This is only possible if all chunks of size @gran are either > > kept > > * as-is or changed from an all-ones state to any other state. > > > > If the @variablename syntax is not doxygen, what is it?
No idea. I don't think Doxygen supports that, or at least I never heard of it. It might be an informal notation which is not meant for any tool at all (?) or maybe for some other tool (?) I know of the following two notations. Default is the Javadoc-style: @param myvariable This variable does this and that. @return True if bla, false if blub. Alternative (but crappy IMHO): \param myvariable This variable does this and that. \return True if bla, false if blub. Just writing @myvariable This variable does this and that. will not work as expected AFAIK (didn't try though, to be honest). Uwe. -- http://hermann-uwe.de | http://sigrok.org http://randomprojects.org | http://unmaintained-free-software.org _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
