On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:35:02PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 11.09.2010 18:09, Uwe Hermann wrote: > > I literally guessed this board-enable and was lucky at the very first try :) > > > > Not sure if DMI matching is required (I guess it is), please let me know > > if I should change that. > > > > lspci/superiotool/flashrom -w are attached. > > > > Could you add a link to the mail at flashrom.org with the logs? That > would be nice for people who go through the changelog and not the > mailing list.
Done. > I agree with David Borg that we want the real fix (Super I/O > autodetection and auto-setup), but given that the Super I/O probing > needs to be revamped, I think this is a lower risk patch. > > I want to merge David's patches directly after 0.9.3 is out, though: > [flashrom] [PATCH] W83697 superio safety checks > [flashrom] [PATCH] W83697xx superio flash enable > [flashrom] [Patch] Reduce usage of w836xx_memw Yep, agreed. > Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> Thanks, r1192. Uwe. -- http://hermann-uwe.de | http://sigrok.org http://randomprojects.org | http://unmaintained-free-software.org _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
