Hi Aleksey, all mails to [email protected] bounce, so I am resending to your sender address.
On 30.11.2010 03:38, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Hi Aleksey, > > thanks for your report. > I noticed that you come from a @nexenta address. Did you test flashrom > under OpenSolaris and Nexenta as well? It should compile and work, but > we didn't get any recent test reports. > > On 30.11.2010 01:59, Aleksey A. Fakeyev wrote: > >> Reading ok, see log below, >> but can't write because (I guess) DUAL-BIOS technology is blame it >> - program detected 2M flash but 1M of this used to fallback and >> firmware binary has size 1M... >> >> > > Yes, flashrom refuses to write images which have a size != the flash > chip size. We are currently discussing how an image size mismatch should > be handled. That decision is really difficult because a top alignment > would work on most x86, but may explode badly on laptops with separate > EC flash. > > It would be nice if you could test write with a full 2 MB image. > > >> LOG: >> >> r...@stalker BIOS # flashrom -Vr ./x58a-ud3r.bin >> flashrom v0.9.2-r1001 on Linux 2.6.36-gentoo-r1_aSe (x86_64), built with >> libpci 3.1.7, GCC 4.5.1 >> DMI string system-manufacturer: "Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd." >> DMI string system-product-name: "X58A-UD3R" >> DMI string system-version: " " >> Found chipset "Intel ICH10R", enabling flash write... OK. >> Probing for Macronix MX25L1605, 2048 KB: probe_spi_rdid_generic: id1 >> 0xc2, id2 0x2015 >> Chip status register is 00 >> Chip status register: Status Register Write Disable (SRWD) is not set >> Chip status register: Bit 6 is not set >> Chip status register: Bit 5 / Block Protect 3 (BP3) is not set >> Chip status register: Bit 4 / Block Protect 2 (BP2) is not set >> Chip status register: Bit 3 / Block Protect 1 (BP1) is not set >> Chip status register: Bit 2 / Block Protect 0 (BP0) is not set >> Chip status register: Write Enable Latch (WEL) is not set >> Chip status register: Write In Progress (WIP/BUSY) is not set >> Found chip "Macronix MX25L1605" (2048 KB, SPI) at physical address >> 0xffe00000. >> === >> This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations: ERASE >> === >> Reading flash... done. >> >> > > Regards, > Carl-Daniel > > P.S. You sent two almost identical mails. The first mail has been > discarded because the contents were almost identical. > -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
