Hi Mathias, thanks for your patch.
Minor nitpick: On 21.12.2010 16:17, Mathias Krause wrote: > (prot & 0xfffff800) + (((((prot & 0x7fc) >> 2) + 1) << 10) - 1)); > This one looks a bit odd. How about (prot & 0xfffff800) + ((((prot & 0x7fc) >> 2) << 10) | 0x3ff); Looks good otherwise. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
