On Sun, 22 May 2011 18:45:14 +0200 Björn Augustsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2011/5/18 Stefan Tauner <[email protected]>: > > On Fri, 13 May 2011 23:22:26 +0200 > > Björn Augustsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Just writing in to let you know that the Gigabyte P55A-UD4 seems to work > >> fine. > > > > hello! > > Hi! > > > there are two revisions of your motherboard according to gigabyte. > > namely rev 1.0 > > http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3239#sp > > and rev 2.0 > > http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3436#sp > > > > the only difference visible on that pages is the ethernet controller > > and small layout changes. i dont think those differences matter for > > flashrom at all, but just for the record: which revision do you have? > > I wasn't sure either, so I downloaded both, and it turns out they > have the same bios image. > > But since you asked, I had another look. It's a bit hard to say. > The box says rev 1.0, but looking at the images, I think it's right. > > * Mine has the "EuP Ready" text in the corner near the DIMM slots, > which only appears > on the rev 2 picture. > * I do not have the additional text near the dolby logo on the rev 2 picture. > * The cap near the USB header (to the left of the dolby logo, at the > edge) is in the > position in the rev 1 picture. > * The ethernet stuff looks more like the rev 1 pic. The "NEC" text is missing, > but that cap behind the audio header is missing, like in the 1.0 pic. > > Weird. Either way, like you said, hopefully it doesn't matter. probably rev 1.0. the prints are much easier to change than the electrical layout. ill make a note. > > when did you read out the other file: before > > or after rebooting? > > I think it was after rebooting. > Anyway, I tried it now, (several reboots later), and the result is > the same as the image I read back then. (ie not quite matching the one I > wrote) i am not sure but i think this is quite normal. it probably saved some settings at the first boot in there. i wont look into it in detail, because it works anyway and it's implausible that flashrom is the cause (and i dont have the time to do it :) -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
