On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:58:45AM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > 2011/6/29 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]>: > > Autodetect target processor architecture. > > Enable architecture dependent compilation of individual sub-drivers for > > the internal programmer. > > Why not to start adopting autotools as a replacement for ahnd-written > makefiles at this point? They already have (proven) macros for > endianness detection, cpu and architecture and many other good and > useful stuff.
If so, I'd rather see cmake. I what I've read is correct, autotools on Win isn't a very nice thing. Also, with cmake you only have a single package to install, with autofoo it's a bit more. As offered on this list before: I'd be willing to create a cmake config if there is genuine interest (i.e. I'd like to have a high probability of getting stuff accepted in the end). Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
