On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 22:38:21 +0200 Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> wrote:
> adding tested board enable with exact matches for identified and > tested boards and NT board enables for potentially compatible boards > should be the scheme to be used in the future for all mainboard > families instead of adding an uncertain generic board enable or none > at all (just because the user does not reply). The policy should be > to add board enables as soon as they become available or at least no > longer than a week after posting it, even without success reports. > > Rationale: This scheme guarantees that we get success reports for > untested boards which allows us to combine them later when we are > sure (enough). OTOH it allows users to easily test the yet > unsupported boards without recompiling by forcing the generic board > enables. And it keeps the patch queue short. > > Investigating all of the above was certainly not worth it on its own > and id suggest to avoid similar efforts in the future by following > the scheme :) this was way too much work to let it bit-rot and has a small impact overall, so it was Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]> and committed in r1457. -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
