Hi Stefan, thank you very much for your kind reply. Wow. I really appreciate the level of detail. I were glad flashrom-community would evaluate my humble report as useful. Thank you very much.
Now coming back to your points: - Next mails will not come in HTML but plain text. I hope changes in my mail setup/initialization file work well. Otherwise I need a hint to correct mail systems' features. - Your assumptions concerning the meaning of "works fine" and the interpretation of update information are correct. - Following your proposal to reset the CMOS chip I used a jumper on my MB as stated in the MSI manual. Analyzing the BIOS afterwards I found most of parameters were reset to default, but e.g. internal BIOS time hadn't been affected. What does your experience recommend? Do you think this behavior is correct or should I remove the battery additionally? - Using MSI tools to flash BIOS is not a good idea, because e.g. MSIHQ set off virus alarms (12 of 40 findings by virustotal.com analyzing the unpacked MSIHQ tool). - Going back to the old version is not such a good idea. You need to know -sorry for not mentioning it earlier- I had some trouble with the USB 3.0 ports. Removing or adding HD hot plugged led sometimes to blue screens (W7). That's what I want to improve by using a newer BIOS. - I had not generated a backup copy of the old BIOS, as I have a second board of same type and age in place. I will use its BIOS if I decide to go back to the old version with the other board. Otherwise I will back up the BIOS of this test board by a different SW. By the way, does flashrom support backing up the BIOS? I hope you and I will find all necessary information. Best regards, Peter -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Stefan Tauner [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2012 14:02 An: Peter A. Braun Cc: [email protected] Betreff: Re: [flashrom] Report on Flashing Board with Intel H67 On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:40:28 +0100 "Peter A. Braun" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, hello peter and thanks for your report! please do not send html mails to mailing lists. your client seems to also send a plain text version, but that one has way too much line breaks in it to be readable (18 line breaks instead of 1 :) > > > last night I flashed my MSI H67MA-ED55(B3) with E7676IMS170. As the name says > Intel H67 is the built in chipset. Flash chip is W25Q64. The flash process > worked fine for me. by working fine you mean that flashrom said "VERIFIED" at the end, i presume. "E7676IMS[.]170" is the name of the file flashed in the zip file 7676v17.zip which is version 1.7 according to MSI. so far so good. > Two things are a bit strange. Currently I try to investigate the reasons for. > Perhaps you have any suggestions. > > 1. Sys fans cannot longer be controlled, because according BIOS > parameters are not longer accessible. Currently I don’t know how to get them > back. > > 2. After cold booting the disabled “Full Screen Logo Display” is > enabled again. It seems to be the default. But other boot parameter are not > changed back to default. the changelog of that bios version mentions "Update CPU smart fan module". so i guess what you are experiencing is that fine new update ;) the newer intel chipsets are quite complicated in these regards and since intel does not specify the update process in detail publicly, it could theoretically be that flashrom is involved too. i have experienced similar problems with an intel board (without flashrom involved) too, so i doubt flashrom is the culprit. try removing all power from the board (maybe even the small battery) for at least 10 seconds. this resets the embedded controller inside the chipset that is used for hardware monitoring and that might be powered whenever there is a power source, even if the computer is turned "off". one way to test if flashrom might be the problem would be to rewrite the old version (did you make a backup?) and reinstall 1.7 with MSI's tool. from my experience if this works it would not prove that flashrom is the problem, but only if it does not work it would prove that flashrom is not the problem. the reason is the problems i have seen as mentioned above. if you did not have problems with the old version, i would suggest rewriting your backup with flashrom. > I attached the result of “flashrom -V” (result.txt). > > > > I hope results are detailed enough to switch entry H67 in your hardware list > onto tested. this was done already due to an earlier report, but i will add the mainboard to our list with a small note referencing this thread. -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
