On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:39:54 +0200
István Rétallér <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> 2012-04-27 21:03 keltezéssel, Stefan Tauner írta: hello again! so basically 
> flashrom works as intended on the abit nf7? you have used the wrong file the 
> first time, but were able to recover it with hot flashing. which file did you 
> use then? the backup, the content of the flash chip of the second board or 
> some other file? do you know the exact revision of the board? there should be 
> a sticker near the pci slots with that information on it. Hi,
> yes, flashrom works correctly. My problem was caused due to my 
> misinterpretation: I supposed the file named nf7_28.bin providing users to 
> flash motherboard BIOS is a simple binary dump. However its structure didn't 
> match my actual BIOS i have read back, I still suppused it must be good. This 
> wrong idea was supported by two facts:
> 1.  I found from 3 different sources with the same binary content (nf7_28.bin)
> 2.  On my computer I found an old and forgotten file named Nf72_15.bin - int 
> was kept in a directory named bios.
> 
> Examining these files I found at 0x7E000 in both file a string: Award 
> BootBlock BIOS and what is strange, my actual bios - read back from the chip 
> - also consisted this string at the same address. So against of the different 
> page0, I said myself it must be a good BIOS.
> But it was a killer....
> 
> Then we recovered my computer as follows:
> - from another NF7 motherboard inserted a BIOS chip into my motherboard and 
> booted.
> - usind flashrom, saved the BIOS content into a file called abit.bin
> - Without shitching power off, removed the good BIOS chip and inserted mine.
> - usind flashrom again, wrote the chip with the abit.bin file
> - verifyed - it was ok
> - after rebooting my motherboard was operating
> 
> It means flasrom was verified for correct reading, writing and even verify 
> was proven. To let you to examine my theory I have attached 3 files:
> Nf72_15.bin is an old bios, found on my computer. Probably it was even used 
> in the old times, but on classic way, i.e. booting from floppy and using the 
> suggested exe file to download this binary dump.
> nf7_28.bin is probably an appropriate BIOS, but you MUST use the suggested 
> exe file for fresh up the chip.
> If I am right, it means the *.bin files are NOT a straighforward binary 
> dumps, bot are somehow mixed up to be coded. Meanwhile, the suggested exe 
> file acts not only a programmer but it even decodes the scrambled file.
> The attached abit.bin is my actual bios, which was read by flasrom from 
> another chip and was written back to my chip.
> 
> So my conclusion is: users should be careful downloading *.bin files found on 
> the internet, because they seem to be coded and your innocent flashrom will 
> be suspected if somebody kills his motherboard - as I did. Flashrom is 
> correct, but if it fed by stupidity, it writes stupidity - so simple.
> 
> The revision code is NF7-S v2.0
> Cheers, Istvan
> 
> Non-text attachments have been stripped:
> nf7_28.bin at http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1177
> Nf72_15.bin at http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1178
> abit.bin at http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1179

ok, everything's clear now. it is very important to use the correct
binary for any mainboard respectively.

i have archived the files for the nf7-s 2.0. the last published
revision "NF7D_27.BIN" is contained in a file named "nf7d27.exe" and
has a md5sum of 55b29d54d8095c3ac94c8d25fa1772fe.

-- 
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner

_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to