Am 28.07.2012 16:30 schrieb Stefan Tauner: > On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 23:32:23 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is it possible that this patch made the board table one or two tabs >> wider? The patch looks like that, and while I agree that some >> files/sections should not have line length limits, adding another 16 >> columns of whitespace is something I'd like to avoid. > in general the url is the source of length problem. > does making the table longer by putting the URL in a line > of its own make sense?
It's certainly a novel idea, and it has some appeal. > i personally would drop the URL anyway.. useless, partially misleading > (for boards with multiple variants) and work for me (only, as i must > emphasize :) Yes, now that Uwe is essentially a fulltime sigrok developer, he's not maintaining that stuff anymore. What do you think about asking someone else to do the tested_stuff maintenance? > iirc uwe was strongly against this, but i would be lying if would say > that his matters much to me in this case (because the tested stuff > branch is the most boring work i do for this project, not because i dont > respect his view). Back then the policy was accepted because he handled the board testing maintenance. We might have to rethink this. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
