On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:59:59 +0200 Luc Verhaegen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:50:19PM +0200, Stefan Tauner wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 02:25:02 +0200 > > Luc Verhaegen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Surely a specific board name can still be provided on the command line > > > for horribly broken bioses like this? > > > > yes, thanks for the suggestion. apparently i forgot that alternative. i have committed the resulting board enable patch in r1566. > I am not sure anymore how much information one has to provide still > though, it's been quite a while. I think pci device ids only, no board > ids, so that not every command line provided board name is accepted. device ids are mandatory, subsystem ids are not checked atm (for non-autodetected boards), but i have left them in anyway. the dmi string is also not checked at all in this case... ill take a look at refactoring the involved functions and the looooong comment explaining all that soon-ish. -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
