On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:19:51 +0200 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> This patch is not ready for merge, a few programmers will not compile > because the conversion is unfinished. > > Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> > > Index: flashrom-max_write_size/flash.h > =================================================================== > --- flashrom-max_write_size/flash.h (Revision 1587) > +++ flashrom-max_write_size/flash.h (Arbeitskopie) > @@ -141,7 +141,10 @@ > > int (*printlock) (struct flashctx *flash); > int (*unlock) (struct flashctx *flash); > - int (*write) (struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, > unsigned int len); > + struct { > + int (*write) (struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned > int start, unsigned int len); > + int max_write_size; > + } writer; > int (*read) (struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *buf, unsigned int start, > unsigned int len); > struct voltage { > uint16_t min; we could make this a writers array already like the erasers array, but with a single entry only for now. while not required for this feature it is clear that we will want to go that way in the future and imho it is also clear that there wont be a single patch that adds all writers to flashchips.c together with the implementation of the usage of this array (i.e. the implementation patch will not touch flashchips.c at all, but there will be one or more patches by steven for example that add those entries ;) -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
