On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Stefan Tauner < [email protected]> wrote:
> did you really test the 1.8V version too? > Nope. We can set that to UNTESTED if you prefer, though I don't think there's much reason to suspect it will fail when the 3V version works. On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Stefan Tauner < [email protected]> wrote: > > > .probe = probe_spi_rdid, > > .probe_timing = TIMING_ZERO, > > @@ -5450,9 +5454,44 @@ > > .unlock = spi_disable_blockprotect, > > .write = spi_chip_write_256, > > .read = spi_chip_read, > > + .voltage = {1700, 2000}, > > }, > > > > { > > + .vendor = "Numonyx", > > + /* ..3E = 3V, uniform 64KB/4KB blocks/sectors */ > > + .name = "N25Q064..3E", > > + .bustype = BUS_SPI, > > + .manufacture_id = ST_ID, > > + .model_id = ST_N25Q064__3E, > > + .total_size = 8192, > > + .page_size = 256, > > + /* supports SFDP */ > > Does it work as expected (testable by removing the chip definition)? > Obviously not or I wouldn't have bothered to make a patch for it :-) On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Stefan Tauner < [email protected]> wrote: > There are a number of other N25Q* chips available apparently. Do you > plan to add them too (NB: http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/3652/)? > Anyone else? Steven, our datasheet muncher maybe? :) > Would if I had more time... -- David Hendricks (dhendrix) Systems Software Engineer, Google Inc.
_______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
