On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:47:39 -0700 David Hendricks <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmmm, that return statement seems to be getting rather unwieldy especially > since we can probably expect a lot more variants. Maybe you can take this > opportunity to re-factor the code a bit, make a table of known strings, and > use a loop instead? You could also annotate the table entries to indicate > whether the processor is known-working and print a warning if not. > > Alternately, perhaps it would be sufficient to use strstr() to find > "GodsonV2", "Loongson-2", and "Loongson-3"? Yes it's awful... but I want to know if it works first and even then I think I don't care enough ATM. I had enough string handling in C this week already :) -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
