Am 23.09.2013 05:42 schrieb Stefan Tauner:
> This fixes a SEGFAULT if a layout entry is included that addresses memory
> outside the current chip's address range.
>
> Also, abort for non-write operations if a layout file is given.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]>

Thanks for your patch!
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]>
with one small comment (no need to change the code, just think about it)

> ---
>  cli_classic.c |  6 ++++++
>  flash.h       | 11 ++++++++++-
>  flashrom.c    | 11 ++++++++---
>  layout.c      | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/layout.c b/layout.c
> index 86351b8..5254115 100644
> --- a/layout.c
> +++ b/layout.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,32 @@ romentry_t *get_next_included_romentry(unsigned int 
> start)
>       return best_entry;
>  }
>  
> -int handle_romentries(const struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *oldcontents, 
> uint8_t *newcontents)
> +/* Validate and - if needed - normalize layout entries. */
> +int normalize_romentries(const struct flashctx *flash)
> +{
> +     chipsize_t total_size = flash->chip->total_size * 1024;
> +     int ret = 0;
> +
> +     int i;
> +     for (i = 0; i < num_rom_entries; i++) {
> +             if (rom_entries[i].start >= total_size || rom_entries[i].end >= 
> total_size) {
> +                     msg_gwarn("Warning: Address range of region \"%s\" 
> exceeds the current chip's "
> +                               "address space.\n", rom_entries[i].name);
> +                     if (rom_entries[i].included)

Shouldn't we warn about invalid rom entries in all cases, not just when
they are active/included? I'm a bit torn on that question.


> +                             ret = 1;
> +             }
> +             if (rom_entries[i].start > rom_entries[i].end) {
> +                     msg_gwarn("Warning: Size of the address range of region 
> \"%s\" is not positive.\n",
> +                               rom_entries[i].name);
> +                     if (rom_entries[i].included)

Same here.


> +                             ret = 1;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int build_new_image(const struct flashctx *flash, uint8_t *oldcontents, 
> uint8_t *newcontents)
>  {
>       unsigned int start = 0;
>       romentry_t *entry;

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

-- 
http://www.hailfinger.org/


_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to