On 1/27/2014 6:18 PM, Stefan Tauner wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:58:45 -0500
Brian Rak <[email protected]> wrote:
Is >16MB a feature that hasn't been implemented, or were there problems
with it? I find references like
http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2013-July/011301.html , but
it doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to me.
That mail is about a related problem that is caused by the current
implementation of flashrom that has actually nothing to do with
4-byte addressing - it's a bug.
Ah, thanks for clearing that up.
There is a PoC implementation of 4-byte addressing but i would could it
rather a hack than a solution:
http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/3897/
I seem to find some
patches that add it as well, but they don't appear to have ever made it in.
Probably the one above(?)
Maybe you can get it to work for your use case but due to time
constraints I can not assist you (much) further, sorry.
That was the one, yea. I never really found it on the patchwork site,
only referenced in some mailing list posts. I'll have to see if I can
get it working, having a hack that works is quite all right for me.
_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
