On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 22:18:48 -0700
Wei Hu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Datasheet available at
> http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/20005119D.pdf

Hi,

thank you for your patch! I have reviewed it and I think you got a few
things wrong:
- Most importantly, I think the block erase sizes are non-uniform
  (for opcode 0xD8). See note 11 of Table 5.1 and Section 3.0 etc.
- Also, the ULBPR requires a WREN opcode sent before it. OTOH your
  spi_disable_blockprotect_generic() calls seems useless (all bits of
  the status register are read-only).
- The spi_prettyprint_status_register_sst25 function is completely
  wrong for these chips.
- The OTP memory, and other advanced features were not documented at
  all.
- Debatably the name of the chip should include the optional A that
  indicates the disable default state of the WP/Hold feature of this
  chip variant.

I have attached my counterproposal that also adds support for the
SST26VF032B(A). Please take a look and tell me if you disagree with
anything I have changed, thanks.

-- 
Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner
>From 6bbce3a432a1719d7bcf63178bc9becb47e55215 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 21:44:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for SST26VF032B(A) and SST26VF064B(A).

Differences between SST25 and these:
1. The WREN instruction must be executed prior to WRSR [Section 5.31].
   There is no EWSR.
2. Block protection bits are no longer in the status register. There
   is a dedicated 144-bit register [Table 5-6]. The device is
   write-protected by default. A Global Block-Protection Unlock
   command unlocks the entire memory [Section 4.1].
3. Non-uniform erase block sizes [Section 3.0, Figure 3.1].

Signed-off-by: Wei Hu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <[email protected]>
---
 chipdrivers.h     |  1 +
 flashchips.c      | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 flashchips.h      |  1 +
 spi25_statusreg.c | 13 ++++++++++
 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+)

diff --git a/chipdrivers.h b/chipdrivers.h
index 851e90a..73b727b 100644
--- a/chipdrivers.h
+++ b/chipdrivers.h
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ int spi_disable_blockprotect_bp2_ep_srwd(struct flashctx *flash);
 int spi_prettyprint_status_register_sst25(struct flashctx *flash);
 int spi_prettyprint_status_register_sst25vf016(struct flashctx *flash);
 int spi_prettyprint_status_register_sst25vf040b(struct flashctx *flash);
+int spi_disable_blockprotect_sst26_global_unprotect(struct flashctx *flash);
 
 /* sfdp.c */
 int probe_spi_sfdp(struct flashctx *flash);
diff --git a/flashchips.c b/flashchips.c
index 9263e15..9e6f677 100644
--- a/flashchips.c
+++ b/flashchips.c
@@ -10014,6 +10014,83 @@ const struct flashchip flashchips[] = {
 
 	{
 		.vendor		= "SST",
+		.name		= "SST26VF032B(A)",
+		.bustype	= BUS_SPI,
+		.manufacture_id	= SST_ID,
+		.model_id	= SST_SST26VF032B,
+		.total_size	= 4096,
+		.page_size	= 256,
+		.feature_bits	= FEATURE_WRSR_WREN | FEATURE_OTP,
+		.tested		= TEST_UNTESTED,
+		.probe		= probe_spi_rdid,
+		.probe_timing	= TIMING_ZERO,
+		.block_erasers	=
+		{
+			{
+				.eraseblocks = { {4 * 1024, 1024} },
+				.block_erase = spi_block_erase_20,
+			}, {
+				.eraseblocks = {
+					{8 * 1024, 4},
+					{32 * 1024, 1},
+					{64 * 1024, 62},
+					{32 * 1024, 1},
+					{8 * 1024, 4},
+				},
+				.block_erase = spi_block_erase_d8,
+			}, {
+				.eraseblocks = { {4 * 1024 * 1024, 1} },
+				.block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7,
+			},
+		},
+		.printlock	= spi_prettyprint_status_register_plain, /* TODO: improve */
+		.unlock		= spi_disable_blockprotect_sst26_global_unprotect,
+		.write		= spi_chip_write_256, /* Multi I/O supported */
+		.read		= spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) and multi I/O supported */
+		.voltage	= {2700, 3600},
+	},
+
+
+	{
+		.vendor		= "SST",
+		.name		= "SST26VF064B(A)",
+		.bustype	= BUS_SPI,
+		.manufacture_id	= SST_ID,
+		.model_id	= SST_SST26VF064B,
+		.total_size	= 8192,
+		.page_size	= 256,
+		.feature_bits	= FEATURE_WRSR_WREN | FEATURE_OTP,
+		.tested		= TEST_OK_PREW,
+		.probe		= probe_spi_rdid,
+		.probe_timing	= TIMING_ZERO,
+		.block_erasers	=
+		{
+			{
+				.eraseblocks = { {4 * 1024, 2048} },
+				.block_erase = spi_block_erase_20,
+			}, {
+				.eraseblocks = {
+					{8 * 1024, 4},
+					{32 * 1024, 1},
+					{64 * 1024, 126},
+					{32 * 1024, 1},
+					{8 * 1024, 4},
+				},
+				.block_erase = spi_block_erase_d8,
+			}, {
+				.eraseblocks = { {8 * 1024 * 1024, 1} },
+				.block_erase = spi_block_erase_c7,
+			},
+		},
+		.printlock	= spi_prettyprint_status_register_plain, /* TODO: improve */
+		.unlock		= spi_disable_blockprotect_sst26_global_unprotect,
+		.write		= spi_chip_write_256, /* Multi I/O supported */
+		.read		= spi_chip_read, /* Fast read (0x0B) and multi I/O supported */
+		.voltage	= {2700, 3600},
+	},
+
+	{
+		.vendor		= "SST",
 		.name		= "SST25WF512",
 		.bustype	= BUS_SPI,
 		.manufacture_id	= SST_ID,
diff --git a/flashchips.h b/flashchips.h
index af0648a..05b0492 100644
--- a/flashchips.h
+++ b/flashchips.h
@@ -592,6 +592,7 @@
 #define SST_SST25VF064C		0x254B
 #define SST_SST26VF016		0x2601
 #define SST_SST26VF032		0x2602
+#define SST_SST26VF032B		0x2642
 #define SST_SST26VF064B		0x2643
 #define SST_SST27SF512		0xA4
 #define SST_SST27SF010		0xA5
diff --git a/spi25_statusreg.c b/spi25_statusreg.c
index f96d4e8..7479b52 100644
--- a/spi25_statusreg.c
+++ b/spi25_statusreg.c
@@ -196,6 +196,19 @@ int spi_disable_blockprotect(struct flashctx *flash)
 	return spi_disable_blockprotect_generic(flash, 0x3C, 0, 0, 0xFF);
 }
 
+int spi_disable_blockprotect_sst26_global_unprotect(struct flashctx *flash)
+{
+	int result = spi_write_enable(flash);
+	if (result)
+		return result;
+
+	static const unsigned char cmd[] = { 0x98 }; /* ULBPR */
+	result = spi_send_command(flash, sizeof(cmd), 0, cmd, NULL);
+	if (result)
+		msg_cerr("ULBPR failed\n");
+	return result;
+}
+
 /* A common block protection disable that tries to unset the status register bits masked by 0x1C (BP0-2) and
  * protected/locked by bit #7. Useful when bit #5 is neither a protection bit nor reserved (and hence possibly
  * non-0). */
-- 
Kind regards, Stefan Tauner

_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to