On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:21:12 -0400 Jerrad Pierce <[email protected]> wrote:
> >there is no need for that parameter. Actually, it is the reason > >flashrom aborts. :) > I see. I tried that initially, but then I get the following warning, > which seems to conflict with the listing of the board as being supported, > so I thought maybe the tool needed me to be more specific > > [snip] > Found chipset "Intel ICH7/ICH7R". Enabling flash write... OK. > Found Eon flash chip "EN25F40" (512 kB, SPI) mapped at physical address > 0xfff80000. > === > This flash part has status UNTESTED for operations: READ ERASE WRITE > The test status of this chip may have been updated in the latest development > [snip] Normally, if a board is reported to work, we get to see a log file including the chip... and if that's not tagged as fully supported either, then we add this too. In this case apparently we did not get a log... but I would assume that it will just work fine. Also, this is not really a warning... we expect untested chips to work in general, but without such we would never get reports on them ;) -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
