On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Stefan Tauner < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 15:19:42 -0600 > Reggie McMurtrey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Not sure why patch seems mangled. I looked at the mailing list archive > to > > see what happened and it shows up ok there. I was informed I should have > > bumped the subject to [PATCH v2]. I'll make sure to do that in the > > future. I'll be glad to post patch again if needed. > Focus on the line breaks and number of tabs/spaces after the + signs... > clearly some kind of mangling happened. > I got to doing a little more digging and found a few issues. I did a little research and figured out how to send patches straight from git and have that working now, will be submitting v2 in a bit. > > > > > Programmer inits don't seem to have any specific meaning other than > > pass/fail. > > Why -2 then? :) > > It looks like the ft2232_spi driver uses incrementing negative numbers as a return code to give you some idea where it bailed. Since my code was wedged off between -1 and -2 I just kept the -2. Looks like this has been done in the past since there was already two seperate places that returned -2 but all other return points was incremented. I could return -1.5 if you like :) --Reggie
_______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
