On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 03:37 +0200, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> +/* Returns true if firmware (and thus hardware) supports the "new" protocol
> */
> +static bool is_new_prot(void)
> {
> - size_t i;
> + /* if (SF100) */
> + return dediprog_firmwareversion >= FIRMWARE_VERSION(5, 5, 0);
> + /* else if (SF600)
> + return dediprog_firmwareversion >= FIRMWARE_VERSION(6, 9, 0);
> */
... and in dediprog_check_devicestring() we still have:
msg_pdbg("Found a %s\n", buf);
if (memcmp(buf, "SF100", 0x5) != 0) {
msg_perr("Device not a SF100!\n");
return 1;
}
Is this patch set actually intended to support SF600? I had assumed so,
so I've rounded up some potential testers for that, and was just trying
to put together something for them to test...
--
David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre
[email protected] Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
