On 14.01.2016 00:19, Stefan Tauner wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 03:27:04 +0100 > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> wrote: >> Code looks good. >> >> There are quite a few hyperlinks to flashrom.org in there. Some use >> http, some use https, some use www.flashrom.org, some use flashrom.org. >> We should decide upon a canonical URL scheme and use that throughout. >> I'd like https, but I have no preference about using www or not. > Fine with me... no-www preferred because of less characters and I have > never understood the www prefixes anyway :) > If I understood you correctly you want this in the same patch?
I figured that since you touched those lines anyway and even fixed one URL, it would reduce churn to have it all in one patch. Side note: I didn't verify all the extra groff trickery and trust you on that. With the URLs adjusted, this is Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]> Regards, Carl-Daniel _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
